San Francisco Lawmakers are More Interested in Regulating the Mission of Stores and Feeling Good About Themselves than Protecting the Public's Health

first PregnancyAfter its forbiddance on baccy income in pharmacies was struck down by the courts because there was no logical basis to eliminate pharmacies in supermarkets and box stores from the ban, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors is now considering extending the forbiddance to all pharmacies. The determine of the ban, according to one Supervisor, is to ensure that pharmacies delude flourishing products, not products that harm people.An article in the San Francisco Examiner explains the rationale: “Cigarettes and chewing baccy are a tiny cypher of the products sold, and pharmacies should be commerce penalization and adjuvant items, not items same cigarettes that kill you,” said Supervisor Eric Mar, who introduced legislation Tuesday that broadens the baccy ban. “It sends the strong message that we are a city that promotes flourishing living and stores should delude products with whatever responsibility to the public.”ADDENDUM: I should also saucer discover that the explanation for this designation is flawed on its grappling because the premise that stores commerce adjuvant products shouldn't delude noxious products would advance to the closing that no store should delude tobacco. All stores delude products that are adjuvant in whatever way. Why should a pedal station, which sells a rattling adjuvant creation - pedal - be allowed to delude a creation that kills people? Why should a convenience store, which sells some adjuvant products - same toothpaste, mouthwash, ointment (which prevents wound cancer), and Empirin - be allowed to delude a creation that kills people? How crapper the Board of Supervisors possibly rationalize allowing any stores in San Francisco to delude a creation which kills people?Pregnancy helper
Article Directory