San Francisco Board of Supervisors Considering a Bill to Ban Toys in McDonald's Happy Meals

first PregnancyI'm not joking.The San Francisco Board of Supervisors - which terminal period voted to forbiddance baccy income in every pharmacies -- is, indeed, considering an designation which would forbiddance the body of toys in McDonald's Happy Meals, unless the meals allow fruits or vegetables and limit the total calories to a given value.San Francisco would not be the first topical polity to take much an action. Last summer, Santa Clara County implemented an designation which bans toys from concern promotions aimed at children (it exclusive covers unincorporated areas of the county). In addition, the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) has threatened to process McDonald's over its body of toys in Happy Meals.The San Francisco designation would affect not exclusive McDonald's Happy Meals, but some fast concern toy giveaways, including Burger King's Kids Meals, which allow a toy.The Rest of the StoryIt haw become as a assail to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, but it is not the toys which are feat immatureness obesity, it is the food. If this honor of intrusion into the marketing of jural products is justified, then so is a more direct move of simply regulating the concern that can or cannot be oversubscribed to children. Obviously, much an move is beyond the pertinent role of government.Moreover, this supply is not as ultimate as it might appear.A exemplary Burger King Kids Meal includes a hamburger, fruitful liberated milk, and apple slices, and supplies 430 calories and 10.5 grams of fat.If instead of a Kids Meal, a parent insisted on his banter having a Garden Salad and fruitful liberated concentrate only, the nutrition would supply 430 calories and 26 grams of fat.So the garden salad and fruitful liberated concentrate option provides the literal aforementioned sort of calories as the Kids Meal. However, the Kids Meal is far healthier, because it supplies exclusive 10.5 grams of fruitful compared to 26 grams of fruitful in the garden salad "healthy" meal.Is the San Francisco Board of Supervisors also feat to forbiddance the supplying of toys in garden salads oversubscribed to children? Why not meet forbiddance the understanding of garden salads to children, since at Burger King, these salads include a "whopping" 26 grams of fat.In fact, a regular boeuf at Burger King is "healthier" than a garden salad. The boeuf has 260 calories and 10 grams of fat, patch the garden salad has 330 calories and 26 grams of fat.At McDonalds, arrangement a boeuf provides inferior fruitful than arrangement a salad with regular intermixture (9 grams of fruitful compared to 15 grams).If you're worried about metal intake, a boeuf and a child's Coke at McDonalds provide inferior metal than a garden salad and an apple juice box, patch providing 50 less fruitful calories.Back at Burger King, study this comparison:Garden salad and dressingCalories: 330Fat: 26 gSodium: 770 mgProtein: 6 gHamburger (with ketchup, mustard, and pickles)Calories: 260Fat: 10 gSodium: 490 mgProtein: 13 gIn every nutritional category listed, the boeuf is better than the garden salad, which includes vegetables and presumably would privileged the product from the San Francisco Board of Supervisors' toy promotion ban.My point is not that hamburgers are generally better than salads, but that nutrition is a complicated concern and finding the blubber problem is not as ultimate as legislating some sort of cushy fix. I'm alive of no grounds that parents would kibosh taking their children to fast concern restaurants if exclusive these restaurants wouldn't provide out toys with their kids' meals. There meet doesn't materialize to be some solidified technological foundation for this honor of intrusion into the correct of companies to market jural products.Pregnancy info
mortgage refinance